That was edited in afterwards. https://stackoverflow.com/posts/63067062/revisions whilst it very well may be a personal project, it certainly wasn't "very clear".
Stuff like this is what drives away underrepresented groups from engaging on the internet. Maybe everyone who upvoted and participated in the uninformed speculation from 'user5994461 should reconsider.
That kind of public ridicule and possible resulting flak from management is why more and more developers participate in knowledge exchange by asking questions from under a throwaway pseudonym (much like user5994461), and only answer or edit other questions from accounts that connect to their identity in any way.