> bipartisan
Also by coincidence (?) the first time I've seen that word used recently in a context that wasn't preceded by the words lack of or similar.
> bipartisan
Also by coincidence (?) the first time I've seen that word used recently in a context that wasn't preceded by the words lack of or similar.
Or just say Obama wouldn't have the guts to do it[0].
[0]https://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/trump-launched-yem...
If or when it makes sense, they can always increase funding for these three centers and or to build additional centers. Which is exactly what I'd expect in the coming years.
Not surprisingly, the bulk of that was from SoftBank’s Vision Fund: https://asia.nikkei.com/Business/SoftBank2/SoftBank-suffers-...
Your premise is that it'll stop at $75 million in funding. I'd bet against that premise. The US Government has a tendency to start its programs small and expand them considerably over time.
Besides, the US simultaneously has several of the world's largest companies pouring resources into quantum computing (Google, IBM, Microsoft, Amazon, Honeywell, Lockheed, Intel, et al.). It's not as though $75 million is the extent of US investment into the space.
And I mean, look at the last paragraph
> ... the NSF that would be given $100 billion over five years to invest in American research and technology issues, including quantum computing.
Which seems low when you consider that we spent $430 bn on the F35 and lifetime expected cost is 1.5tn for more acquisition and maintenance. Governments work with larger amounts of money and when you look at science (arguably the best way to get ahead in military) it is pennies (CERN was funded internationally and only cost around $20bn over 10 years and $1bn/yr for operation). I mean the largest super computers cost only a couple hundred million, which means if Google or Facebook wanted to, they could compete.
Quantum computing ? I've seen just a few months ago some article about a single start-up raising >200M ?
We know enough about quantum computers to be able to build some of them in limited ways which are commercially useful in very specific domains, so then companies can get investment to do that.
But we still don't really understand all of the fundamentals, and it's always hard to raise investment for fundamental research.
Suppose you could prove that building a quantum computer that can run Shor's Algorithm on interestingly large numbers is impossible. Knowing that would be of immense value. People could stop wasting time trying to create it or defend against it. But how would anybody commercialize that information? Who has the incentive to fund that research?
In which way are quantum computers commercially useful?
VC Bait seems like a natural fit. Just say you are making a quantum computer that predicts global warming trends using blockchain. Might want to buy a wheel barrel for all your money you’ll be leaving that meeting with.
Eh, bipartisan stuff still happens. Look at the military industrial complex. Expanding executive power, expanding the surveillance state. Pro wall street regulation repeal.
Usually its to screw us