2030 is the new 2020 where we push away dreams for the future, forget about them, try to do them at the last moment and miss the deadline. I think it would be better to have have smaller goals with a shorter timeframe.
Based on past evidence this is not likely to be a set and forget arrangement for Apple.
I'm sure pretty smart people spent a lot of time in coming up with this goal that is ambitious and pretty noble may a I say. Probably going through months of goal planning a long vision setups.
And with low effort comment you can say, meh, I think I know better without almost any contextual information about any of this.
I don't mean to be insulting, just that I think it's a little disrespectful to peoples effort. And only negative.
Maybe you can present us a semi detailed plan of how Apple can better set their carbon emission program.
Besides, it's not a difficult target to achieve. I don't think it would cost much more than a few tens of millions of dollars to start and operate some solar and wind power stations of sufficient capacity to offset all of their consumption. It should be pocket change for Apple's budget.