Man Dressed as Delivery Driver Executes Hit on Federal Judges House
abcnews.go.com
abcnews.go.com
> Last week, on July 15, the judge was assigned to a case that had links to late sex abuser Jeffrey Epstein.
> The case Salas is presiding over involves as ongoing lawsuit brought by Deutsche Bank investors who claim the company made false and misleading statements about its anti-money laundering policies and failed to monitor 'high-risk' customers including convicted sex offender billionaire Jeffrey Epstein.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8539683/amp/Federal...
It's also day seven of her being assigned the case. She may have sent out some preliminary inquiries to start thinking about a trial schedule. She definitely didn't make any decisions that have the potential to expose whatever criminal mastermind people believe to be lurking in the shadows.
Later in the trial, a judge's recusal could have resulted in a mistrial, potentially delayed it for years, or even caused plaintiffs to run of money or patience to try again.
But at the very beginning, there is no reason to believe she is different than any other judge who would be assigned in her stead, and the schedule would barely be affected.
The judge that would be assigned in her stead is different in that they will operate with the knowledge that their predecessor had their family murdered, quite possibly because of the case they're now handling. How is that not obvious?
Even if you're right and fear is the motivation, fear in which direction?
“Deutsche Bank Investors Sue Over Epstein Ties, Stock Drops
July 16, 2020, 4:29 PM
COURT: D.N.J.
TRACK DOCKET: No. 20-cv-08978
JUDGE: Esther Salas”
Compare with the subtitle of the OP: “Judge Esther Salas, who serves on the federal bench in New Jersey...”
The court documents are also accessible:
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/17354158/karimi-v-deuts...
https://imgur.com/gallery/lV2abFj?s=sms
https://newjerseyglobe.com/judiciary/son-of-federal-judge-sl...