Hacker News Reader

Comment by Kalium | Hacker News Reader

Honestly, the author seems mostly to be reacting to the name cargo pants. Thus the reeling off of associations they aggressively dislike.

These are merely pants with additional pockets. Their placement being similar to cargo pants being merely a coincidence...

View on HN

Yes, coincidence of reinventing the wheel. They reinvented cargo pants with pockets going inside instead outside. The purpose of the two is exactly the same: storing things. I don't care who invented cargo pants and who started wearing them first. I'm neither a pilot nor a soldier, nor am I pretending to be one, but I find them super convenient.

The whole point of the article is the placement and design of pockets.

Saying, "Oh, its just all some pants with pockets and thus it's all the same reinvention" doesn't help anybody - it's like saying to one which proposes a better roofing system that a shed and a house have both a roof already, so why bother making it better for one of those. Er what?

Sorry, you are conflating two things: placement and design. OP hasn't changed the placement of the cargo pants pockets. For me as a proverbial user, the interface didn't change. The implementation details did. Don't get me wrong, I like the approach OP took, but this is basically an iteration on cargo pants design, by making them more socially acceptable.

It's only an iteration on cargo pants if they started from cargo pants. If they started from dress pants, then it's an iteration on dress pants. The fact that it might be only a few steps away from cargo pants is irrelevant - it's also only a few steps away from most other pant designs.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com