Somehow the "everything is free speech and nobody should ever be censored" arguers forget this.
Somehow the "everything is free speech and nobody should ever be censored" arguers forget this.
I always shake my head when seeing people smugly trotting out the "trying to get people fired is protected free speech too" argument. Don't they realize they're trying the same arguments that cross-burners tried in courts and failed at? Moreover, don't they realize what using having to use cross-burners' legal arguments to defend their desire to freely intimidate individuals looks like to an outsider from a moral perspective? If free speech proponents are forgetting things, well, they're not the only ones.
Beware empty belief in general principles.
That was a rather fringe outrageous thing to say.
Let me clarify: While people may be educated enough to cast votes how many beans is in the jar, or what cause to support in the moment, they are mostly not equipped to be jury and judge of mob rule, or am I wrong?