In contrast, the F-35 has a crazy fast development timeline, and is being sold to several countries. So they are biting off a much bigger chunk, and being much more public about it as part of the political game. So it's harder to keep quiet when you make a huge deal about showing up at an airshow in the UK and then have to cancel because your fleet got grounded because of fuel system issues. The overall difference isn't that the F-35 has more problems, it's just that they are finding them quicker and you're actually hearing about them. (Edit: the missed airshow was because of engine fires, the fuel system was a separate issue- sorry for the mistake. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/newsbysector/industry/de...)
The F-22 has also killed pilots, caused others to eject with unknown causes, and had other reports of pilots losing consciousness but eventually recovering. They grounded the whole fleet several years ago, the oxygen generation system has been the subject of several complaints. This probably wouldn't have made the news either except for the fact that people died.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lockheed_Martin_F-35_Lightning...
I think for political reasons they don’t have access to Russian or European aircraft and they probably don’t want Chinese ones. This is the first new fighter we have available to them.
[1] https://www.cnbc.com/2019/07/18/f-35-has-freaked-out-iran-an...
Right now the F-35 is simply not ready, but I'm not sure anybody seriously expected it to be? Comparing the timescales, we should check again in 15 years, or if it goes really fast maybe at least 5?
Now specifically the software dev history of the F-35 is an interesting story..