It's long past time to retire Lena as the canonical test image in CG.
Things like the canonical test image being a sexy "come hither" look, coming from a Playboy centerfold, definitely don't help.
And it's not enough to say "well the rest of the centerfold isn't shown". Come on. We all know the source of the image.
And "tradition" is far less important than CS being a welcoming environment for all people.
Computer science is a profession. Let's use images that are appropriate for a professional setting.
Let’s focus on real things, not on this phony issues!
It’s offensive, it keeps women out of CS, it’s a symbol of the patriarchy, etc...
As woman, I am saying this is not the case, at least not for THIS woman: I’ve never felt excluded because of Lena, my CS studies were not impeded by Lena in any way, I have actually used Lena’s image for a small project.
Of course I would accept someone saying that the image offends someone (better if this point is substantiated by evidence) but I absolutely reject people speaking in the name of all women, an saying that Lena offends all women. This is not true!
Also, be careful not to attack a strawman: the issue is of course not just the image.
As a man I experienced plenty of unpleasant conversation about women, conversation which might be referred to as men-talk or some such. Also, I'm not competitive at all, while many men would identify that as manly behavior. One of the few women in my university program confided that this (usually unfounded) self-assuredness was very annoying and a huge turn-off, a feeling we both shared, but would have been regarded as an essential ingredient to participating in that program.
Of course, such issues are also present in the reverse. My wife had similar conversations but about men amongst some female colleagues. Fortunately, we've met enough people to not have to settle for such juvenile views/conversations. I can absolutely see how a woman would find it very difficult to be comfortable in such an environment however, when I didn't even feel part of that mildly macho culture.
Just because something is 'anti-women', does not mean it can only bother women. Our cultures associate many things to gender, which in my view is a leftover of centuries past and we would do well to remove that sort of association. Maybe then, a picture of Lena wouldn't represent a (sub)culture so accurately and be therefore an indicator of the problem.
You are making a much stronger claim without evidence. How is Lena harmful? How many women did Lena drive out of CS?
Do you have some proof, some data, besides neo-Marxist crap such a intersectionalized mysoginistic oppression?
It reminds me of that video that showed that college students are outraged by stereotypical Mexican Halloween costumes, but actual Mexicans are fine with it.
Are you fighting for women, or for your ego?
It feels to me like there's some deeper reason for the gender disparity in tech than Lena. I don't have any issue with changing the picture whatsoever - I'm sure we can find some other picture to use as a baseline (big buck bunny?). But I would be willing to bet that it will do precisely nothing to change the fact that there aren't very many women in CS.
I can think of many other factors that seem more plausible to me. Me and my friends were into minecraft - at the time, you installed minecraft mods by overwriting files inside the minecraft.jar. If you wanted to set up a minecraft sever, you were given some command-line program to run and you had to set up port-forwarding in your router. Just doing this stuff makes you more comfortable with computers, and makes the jump to "I want to start programming" seem much smaller than someone who has never stepped outside Chrome and MS Office. And PC gaming is much more popular among young men than young women, so this avenue of becoming comfortable with the computer is going to be much more accessible to men. Not to mention, if you like games, eventually you'll want to make one - I think every PC gamer has at least thought about installing Unreal and trying to make their dreams into reality. I think if we actually want to increase how many women are in CS (and nothing would make me happier), this is the kind of stuff we should be thinking about, not whether image processing programmers use a picture of an attractive woman with bare shoulders too often.
> Quis autem vel eum iure reprehenderit, qui inea voluptate velit esse, quam nihil molestiae consequatur, vel illum, qui dolorem eum fugiat, quo voluptas nulla pariatur?
Translation: Who has any right to find fault with a man who chooses to enjoy a pleasure that has no annoying consequences, or one who avoids a pain that produces no resultant pleasure?
This text could very well be the first page of a softcore erotica (or even hardcore!). The rest of the text is not usually visible. But then again, neither is the rest of lena!
It's a philosophical argument against Epicurianism. Which has as much in common with softcare erotica as the phone book.
Not sure what your point is.
But if it were true, then you'd have it your way: it'd also be inappropriate in professional settings that don't naturally necessitate it.
According to Wikipedia[0], "[t]he placeholder text is taken from parts of the first book's discourse on hedonism." The first book being the first book of Cicero's De finibus bonorum et malorum.
[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/De_finibus_bonorum_et_malorum
Women are people, they don't care.