Wow, that post is so ad hominem that it makes him less credible. Is this how he usually responds?
But the content is very valid, you should give it a fair read, regardless of how you view Brad's language.
I read Peren's claims, and IMHO they're very thin. It seems to be a classic case of "I don't like this" (which is fair enough) and then trying to find "objective" arguments to support that position. Not impressed.