Putin plays on ideology created by USSR. Lie, lie, nothing but lie. Bolsheviks invented a lot in terrorism. It takes century to unfold. ISIS followed same book [2].
Sorry to bring it here, it is awful they want to start it again.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prague_Spring
[2] https://www.russiamatters.org/analysis/islamic-state-and-bol...
Considering that about 80% of German losses happened on the Eastern front, this isn't far from the truth.
Meanwhile, the White House claims that the war was won by the US and the GB [0]. And the US embassy in Denmark 'inadvertently' claims that Auschwitz was liberated by the Americans.[1]
[0] https://mobile.twitter.com/whitehouse/status/125884241152413...
[1] https://mobile.twitter.com/usembdenmark/status/1222249721554...
It would be more precise to say the Russians were an American mercenary army. They were pretty much funded by them, most materiel was US produced and delivered for free.
> In total, the U.S. deliveries to the USSR through Lend-Lease amounted to $11 billion in materials: over 400,000 jeeps and trucks; 12,000 armored vehicles (including 7,000 tanks, about 1,386 of which were M3 Lees and 4,102 M4 Shermans); 11,400 aircraft (4,719 of which were Bell P-39 Airacobras) and 1.75 million tons of food.
Compare with totals [2], check out USSR tanks production (119,583) [3]. And Lend Lease resources were not free - they had to be payed back.
The brilliance of USA move was helping others to fight their enemy. You can always replace goods but no way to replace a man. Without USSR they would loose a lot. Quite possibly there would be no USA today.
[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soviet_industry_in_World_War_I...
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lend-Lease
[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Military_production_during_Wor...
[3] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soviet_combat_vehicle_producti...
We most certainly did, we still exist as a nation.
That I hope will change someday.
We have shook off that and got quite a cynical attitude.
I see you haven't done the same.
I don't have a hope that it will change someday.
The idea that the US bought millions of Soviet lives is as ridiculous as it is insulting.
The Soviet people fought in an existential war, the defeat meant death in concentration camps for some, and life as slaves for others.
All the stuff the USSR got in the lend-lease, while much appreciated, is a small fraction of the resources the USSR commited to the war.
"delivered for free"
You understand that it was called "lend-lease" for a reason?
Nothing is less disrespectful than not telling the story of ordinary people, in favor of national or foreign narratives.
I don't know in what kind of warped reality you live if you write things like 'the Russians were an American mercenary army'.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lend-Lease
---
That claim on twitter is stupid but so is "USSR only"
The second front was opened only in 1944 when the outcome of the war was clear.
"Truth should be respected."
The truth clearly isn't respected in the West. You could see it in the American government statements, you can see that in these French polls: https://www.les-crises.fr/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/sondage...
"That claim on twitter is stupid but so is "USSR only""
Nope, you cannot equate these two things. Again, about 80% of German divisions were destroyed by the USSR.
So you fight lie with your lie.
Your view is so one-sided that it is easy to accept opposite one-sided view. Not allies, not entire world - "it is all USA because USSR claims everything for itself, you can't trust these USSR liers".
And what you see in the White House tweeter is a lie.
That claim is about Western Europe only [0]. Think about it. Without USA and UK entire Europe would be occupied by USSR. Litva claimed it was liberated in 1993 (48 years after end of war). I never understood them until one day.
My country was attacked without declaration of war in June 22, 1941.
My country was attacked without declaration of war in February 27, 2014.
It opens eyes.
I can't be sure but people from Latvia, Lithuania, Estonia, Romania, Hungary, Czech Republic, Slovakia, Mongolia, Moldova, Georgia, Ukraine may understand. You may check what do they think about Russia, like Poland [3].
Russian government antagonizes these countries. It does not matter because its real enemies are its own people.
----
Navalny claims "27 millions Russians" - that number is entire USSR [1], Russia loss 13,950,000; Ukraine loss 6,850,000.
[0] Sorry, Russian language source for now https://www.bbc.com/russian/news-52611746
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_War_II_casualties
[3] first link I've found - conveniently omits partitioning czechoslovakia and early years but is representative https://www.znak.com/2020-01-17/chto_v_polshe_dumayut_o_ross...
Why not? It took the USSR only 11 days to defeat the Kwantung Army (0.7 million soldiers) in the Manchurian Strategic Offensive Operation. [0]
[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soviet_invasion_of_Manchuria
Don't buy the Hollywood perspective on WW2 without first considering that it's far from the full picture. For example, China/Japan details are not as well known in western world, but a significant situation and part of the conflict with lots of people killed, which also happened before 1939 partly.
As always, it's more complicated...
That's false. Russia and Germany had a non-aggression pact. Also you should read about the Munich Agreement[0], that preceded the Molotov-Ribbentrop pact and clearly shown that no one was willing to fight Germany and protect Czechoslovakia besides the USSR.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soviet_invasion_of_Poland
[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occupation_of_the_Baltic_state...
[3] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/German%E2%80%93Soviet_Credit_A...
Which country wasn't trading with Nazi Germany?
Bolsheviks were terrorists [7], the state evolved from terrorists organisation. It should be shamed just as we shame Fascists. Meanwhile in Russia Stalin popularity is record high [8].
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gulag
[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Purge
[3] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soviet_famine_of_1932%E2%80%93...
[4] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Passport_system_in_the_Soviet_...
[5] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_revolution
[6] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soviet_Empire
All that the parent comment listed doesn't have anything to do with that.
The fact is that the USSR and Germany signed a non-aggression pact, not a treaty of alliance. You can read the text [0] yourself and see that there is nothing resembling a war alliance.
[0] https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Molotov%E2%80%93Ribbentrop_Pa...
https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Molotov%E2%80%93Ribbentrop_Pa...
They even divided Poland in a coordinated attack on two fronts.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/German%E2%80%93Soviet_military...
It is not the name that matters but content and actions.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polish%E2%80%93Czechoslovak_bo...
[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polish%E2%80%93Ukrainian_War
[3] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Treaty_of_Versailles
[4] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/German%E2%80%93Soviet_Border_a...
> By the combined efforts of the great powers of the USSR, USA, UK fascist Germany was defeated in the ashes
That victory was rebirth of USSR. Heroes returned home, no way to rule them as before. But wounds were not allowed to heal, 9 May become day of "we were attacked, still plenty of enemies around". Russians, Czechs, Slovaks, Ukrainians, Georgians, Moldovan (and many others) fought together. USSR attacked Czechoslovakia, Russia attacked Moldova, Georgia and Ukraine.
Somehow your counterexample is loss and contribution. I never said there was not.
> "turning the tide for the Russians^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H USSR"
By USSR census Russians 53%, Ukrainians 21%, even Slavs would be incorrect - 78%. Census 1937 [3] was not published because of the man-made famine [4] consequences. Official position - there was no such thing.
Hardly anyone knows about occupation of Poland [5], Baltic states [6] and War with Finland [7].
Could they have won war alone? No. Germans occupied a lot of industrial territories with Blitzkrieg, not enough time to restart factories [8]. Without support there would be no Moscow and Stalingrad. There would be guerilla war but that's not enough.
Back to topic. In Russia it is believed that after taking Berlin soldiers should have fought Allies. That's liberation war for you.
[1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5gzZoVm-joc&t=20m23s
[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soviet_Census_(1926)
[3] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soviet_Census_(1937)
[4] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holodomor
[5] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occupation_of_Poland_(1939%E2%...
[6] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occupation_of_the_Baltic_state...
[7] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Winter_War
[8] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evacuation_in_the_Soviet_Union
And they were not the only ones: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Unthinkable
I mean today, when hardly any solder left alive.
[Citation needed]
Some facts - signs "On Berlin" (На Берлин) [1]? Anyone else want this war again?
But best mark is the leader support [2]:
> In January 2013, at the time of 2011–2013 Russian protests, Putin's approval rating fell to 62%, the lowest figure since 2000 and a ten-point drop over two years. By May 2014, following the annexation of Crimea, Putin's approval rating had rebounded to 85.9%, a six-year high.
... improved after aggression on "brother Slavs", war in neighboring country, tanked economy [3], [4].
[1] https://www.google.com/search?q=%D0%BD%D0%B0+%D0%B1%D0%B5%D1...
[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public_image_of_Vladimir_Putin...
[3] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russian_financial_crisis_(2014...
[4] https://www.google.com/publicdata/explore?ds=d5bncppjof8f9_&...
Nothing in what you have written has any relation to your statement: "In Russia it is believed that after taking Berlin soldiers should have fought Allies".
That Germans resolved this conflict and leave on. And Russians cling for their only perceived superiority as war machine like there is nothing else to be proud of. Like it is zero sum game - their own victory and noones else.
You are not alone - their is entire country.