Jesus. I imagine getting the 'big questions' right is so vague as to remove any culpability from both YC and those it funds.
I mean, if I had a friend who openly claimed to be 'naughty' in this way, I'd start being very cautious around them.
I mean, if I had a friend who openly claimed to be 'naughty' in this way, I'd start being very cautious around them.
By not following those assumptions (rules) you can make a new better model which might have better accuracy at representative real world problem than the existing model.
It doesn't mean that it's unethical or morally wrong. It doesn't have to be.