You can be a criminal and a journalist, a thief and a journalist, a horrible person and a journalist.
Do those acts of extortion render those individuals and their supporting editors not-journalists too? I don’t think so. Ethical lapses, deplorable though they may be, are perfectly compatible with still fulfilling the role of a profession.
[1] YouTube adpocalypse effort led by Carlos Maza
[2] NBC’s repetitive naming of Google Ads and brands alongside cherry picked comments on Zero Hedge and The Federalist to delist those competitors.
[3] NYT recent threat to doxx the Scott Alexander blog
This is a federal court finding that people that revealed the war crimes its government perpetrated "did so illegally". Meanwhile they of course don't file charges against the war criminals.
That does not make it untrue - but it's not like it's evidence weighed by a jury in a fair trial - it's very much one side of the story?