HN: Governments don’t fund enough scientific research projects.
Also HN: Governments shouldn’t be funding this scientific research project.
Can’t win with this crowd.
Also HN: Governments shouldn’t be funding this scientific research project.
Can’t win with this crowd.
There's a non negligible amount of people, even those who have worked at CERN previously, saying that it just doesn't make sense to put more investment into a new supercollider which might just show that there's an energy desert of particles in the regime it's testing.
You're also falling prey to the fallacy that HN acts as a single entity, in reality everyone here has different opinions and can't just be all lumped in one bucket saying HN thinks this or that. It's obviously going to seem contradictory if you view it as if it's a single person
So is everything in life, but that doesn't help us actually determine which are the "right projects".
==Going to an obviously hyperbolic extreme for the sake of the argument, say that the EU invested billions in determining if the moon is really made of cheese then that's obviously a waste of money even if it is a scientific investment.==
That you have to go to such a ridiculous argument seems to say something about your stance. What would we learn if we discovered the moon was made of cheese? Why would it matter? What is the scientific impact of a cheese moon? Without those answers it isn't really a scientific investment.
==There's a non negligible amount of people, even those who have worked at CERN previously, saying that it just doesn't make sense to put more investment into a new supercollider which might just show that there's an energy desert of particles in the regime it's testing.==
And a non-negligible amount of people, even those who currently work at CERN, think it is worthwhile. We could play this game all day (which is my entire point). If the test fails, we still get to learn something new. A foundation of the scientific method.
==You're also falling prey to the fallacy that HN acts as a single entity, in reality everyone here has different opinions and can't just be all lumped in one bucket saying HN thinks this or that. It's obviously going to seem contradictory if you view it as if it's a single person==
You seem to be falling prey to the fallacy that all people who worked at CERN act as a single entity. In reality, people who have worked at CERN have different opinions. Similarly, I've seen many posts about how HN is a hive mind. I guess that is just when it suits the narrative.
Also humans: Oh no! They're doing some bad stuff I don't like! Let's tell'em off!
Man is not the member of one group only and does not appear on the scene of human affairs solely in the role of a member
of one definitive group. In speaking of social groups it must be remembered that the members of one group are at the same
time members of other groups. The conflict of groups is not a conflict between neatly integrated herds of men.
It is a conflict between various concerns in the minds of individuals.
Ludwig von Mises - Theory and History