That was expensive, but after someone wedged an oversized truck into the tunnel, blocking it for three weeks, it was worth it. Gets tripped about 18 times a year.
That was expensive, but after someone wedged an oversized truck into the tunnel, blocking it for three weeks, it was worth it. Gets tripped about 18 times a year.
Might have been better off erecting a giant, no-tech billboard picturing a previous crash. But your projected water screen is awesome - they could buy one and play footage from these youtube videos while they wait on the red light.
Seems to me that's the idea behind the setup. You put on a long red light -- long enough that hopefully the truck driver would notice the lit up sign and realize that he need to do whatever he can to make a turn when possible. Trouble is that for some people the light would have to be 10+ minutes long before they would notice that it's still red.
Just a toilet flush mechanism to a pipe with thousands of holes spraying downwards, and a bulb, lens, and plastic film for the logo.
The bulb would be a few of those football stadium arc lamps. One kilowatt per square meter is sunlight brightness, so you're going to be needing ~10kw of lighting.
The whole system, complete with installation labor, probably $30k. Most of that is in mechanical supports for the water system.
Except, government being government, I bet this was a $10M contract awarded to someone's mate...
Even has its own Twitter account, because of course it does:
https://twitter.com/MontagueStBridg/status/12197515386602332...
https://twitter.com/MontagueStBridg/status/12068168482782535...
https://twitter.com/MontagueStBridg/status/11919444569053306...
It also website counting when it last was hit:
https://howmanydayssincemontaguestreetbridgehasbeenhit.com/
With full history:
https://howmanydayssincemontaguestreetbridgehasbeenhit.com/h...
It's also a bit hard to miss:
#1 - multiple big coloured signs
#2 - bright rubber things that will hit your truck and make a noise
#3 - sign, flashing lights and stripe across bridge.
It's apparently slated to be replaced, though.
[1] https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S235214651...
I have no idea how you can be so distracted when driving that you fail to register when your truck is whacked by those height bars, but ... ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
They've been driving day in day out on autopilot. Signs begin to blur after a while.
Destroying the truck is indeed overkill though
Great engineering on what appears to be a tough problem.
Someone found just the right use case and went for an unconventional display tech.
Love it.
Another more insistent approach I have seen elsewhere is to mount a large steel bar across the road, which takes the top of the truck off before they hit the bridge.
(edit:not very simple problem, obviously..)
FWIW I have read about this at length generally at a local level, living and working next to a couple of bridges with this issue. A high tech approach has been tried and abandoned with these bridges as they were (fatally) not effective (though not this high-tech). I naturally assumed there was some particular reason for the tunnel.
I read the rest of the thread before I commented, the ones you point out were written after, and they do indeed go some way toward explaining that particular issue at that particular tunnel. The original post did not explain anything but the bad road design.
While we are giving friendly advice, your comments may be better received if you gave them in a spirit of generosity, as I have taken yours, rather than jumping straight to judgements and epithets.
As an aside, i work in the software industry, and here, that is absolutely not the case at all.
I've found that approaching these with the question of "what drove them to implement such a system" leads to much more enlightenment than going from the point of "they're idiots for implementing it this way."
It's more obvious in footage from the camera located on the left side of the bridge.
Why do you think the team at the tunnel would go to such lengths and expense if there was a simple solution?
Only possibly worse, as I assume the explosion would have nowhere to go but down.
Still not remotely optimal but avoiding damage to the tunnel requiring far more blockage seems like a good tradeoff.
I personally think things like red light with height detector or metal bars that bump into your truck and make massive amount of noise should be enough.
Water curtains with lasers projecting stop sign? That's just crazy. And we all pay for the infrastructure to save people who can't be bothered to stop before red light.
In my opinion if things like that start getting implemented this is just going to cause people to pay even less attention. Everybody should know to stop before red light.