Thought experiment: if a single corporation owned a website within which 100% of public speech was conducted, would you still be so eager to defend their "right" to control the thoughts and words of the entire world?
But with the Network Effect naturally concentrating communication to a few sites, I'm starting to feel conflicted about that.
There's way better explanation here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23576919
Okay let's follow that logic: precisely at what point does that become a monopoly problem?