The argument was "if somebody is emotionally triggered by using some term, we should replace that term with something else".
I'm not suggesting it's a good point, I'm just pointing out that there's going to be a lot of renaming to do.
I'm not suggesting it's a good point, I'm just pointing out that there's going to be a lot of renaming to do.
I wasn't really trying to make a point there, just wanted to be (arguably) funny.