The arguments that "we should break up these companies because they're too successful" are slippery slopes to authoritarianism.
I don’t know what the answer is, but rewarding corruption and discouraging success are not feasible in the long term. Both arguments above seem legitimate.
>I don’t know what the answer is, but rewarding corruption and discouraging success are not feasible in the long term.
Maybe the answer is limiting the government's ability to pass laws that unfairly privilege one company over others. Power that doesn't exist can't be misused.
We still haven’t become an authoritarian government like China.