Nope. That’s not how it works. It’s easy to find out with a simple internet search. https://academic.oup.com/ajcn/article/79/5/899S/4690223
But keep the downvotes going since it insults you so much
But keep the downvotes going since it insults you so much
It also says the exact opposite of what you seem to believe, which is that diets with different macronutrients compositions have different weight outcomes despite having the same number of calories.
> Neither macronutrient-specific differences in the availability of dietary energy nor changes in energy expenditure could explain these differences in weight loss. Thermodynamics dictate that a calorie is a calorie regardless of the macronutrient composition of the diet.
Note:
* Thermodynamically, the amount of energy in a calorie is fixed
* The differences in these energies cannot explain weight loss changes driven by macronutrients as found in other studies
Is anyone here under ten percent body fat and a muscular physique? I really doubt it.
And that difference is basically how hard the body works to break down the nutrients.
There is no magic food that makes it impossible to gain weight. And at the end of the day, a calorie is a calorie. Want to control your weight? Control your intake.
And for what its worth, I'd imagine the effect size to be even stronger for weight gain.
"I don't know what you think you're saying"
Let your reasoning speak for itself. The unnecessary snark diminishes the point you are trying to make.
The conclusion of the study was stated in the study. It says what it says. And what it says is that calories are pretty much fungible.
The study is NOT saying the macronutrient composition controls, in any general condition, 1 to 2 pounds.