Do people really think MLK felt safe when he was protesting? He was brave, new assassination was likely, and still marched.
I'm genuinely curious. Would you care to elaborate?
If BLM could get enough people to boycott corporations who have benefitted from this status quo, then they could force them to push through the changes they want.
If you have numbers, theres a bunch of things you could do without even stepping outside, let alone go and protesting, causing mayhem and chaos for our essential workers during this pandemic. My idea may not be the right one, they'll have to figure it out.
You only see these protests as exercises in violence and mayhem, which is exactly what the powers that be want. It completely delegitimizes these First Amendment protests in the eyes of many.
Much of that violence comes from interlopers who hijack the effort, and of that violence is manufactured by outsiders intentionally stirring up shit. The recent "antifa" account that was really a white nationalist organization comes to mind.
Consistently framing the protesters as being the ones who are inciting or participating in this violence can only be disingenuous at best.
Again, violence is bad, m'kay? We get that. It also means that it's bad when it comes from the police as well.
Boycotting is a luxury, and is a dilute and indirect route to change. Perhaps they should just calm down and file a complaint with the police department and a manager will straighten everything out just right?
>There are other ways to protest.
Feel free to share any protest ideas you have that keep them safe and achieve Civil Rights Act level reforms without requiring people in the streets making the powerful uncomfortable.