As a side effect, it should really help Google and other search engines to rank those websites. External links of good quality still the best SEO.
As a side effect, it should really help Google and other search engines to rank those websites. External links of good quality still the best SEO.
I think the biggest problem isn't so much find "hey, that's a cool article"-type of content, but typing in [programming concept] in Google. What I want to find is things like in-depth experiences and advice regarding this which complement the manual. What I actually find it loads of "howtos" with "copy this" which just rehash the manual.
Results vary a bit depending on [programming concept], and I don't think simple "getting started with"-articles are completely useless either. But generally speaking, there are too many of them, many of them are not of high quality, and it obscures more in-depth content.
I'm not sure if maintaining a list of links would really solve that. Perhaps community projects like "awesome-foo"-lists have some potential here, but in practice I've found many of them to be dumping grounds rather than carefully curated.
But I fully agree, people should be creating their own ecosystems with links, rather than keeping huge portals happy.