For example, the first clip I looked at claims "Couple of police officers are seen beating and manhandling an unarmed man. The officers are throwing punches while he was on the ground and pinned.".
What ACTUALLY happened was that a protester was physically assaulting somebody else, and the police rushed in to separate them and secure the situation. They attempted to arrest the assaulter, who then resisted arrest and started punching an officer in the face, and was therefore punched back as a result.
The clips are primarily given without any context of what led up to the event, which is hugely important, and then "conveniently" forget to mention all of the relevant information, such as the fact that the person getting hurt was resisting arrest and punching officers in the face.
The fact that you have to "conveniently" leave out facts, leave out context of what led up to the events, and give political spin to what you're trying to show makes me immediately dismiss everything you're trying to say.
The second clip I've looked at claims "The Police try to break up the peaceful protest by resorting to hitting individuals with batons.".
What ACTUALLY happens is that they cut out all context of what led up to the situation, and cut in to a point where anybody with half a brain could see that the cops had been giving lawful orders for rioters to disperse, for what was probably a long time, they're on a loudspeaker giving them lawful orders to disperse, warning them that if they don't disperse force will be used against them, they decide to ignore lawful orders, and force is used against them to make them disperse.
The way the headline makes it sound, they were just nice peaceful protesters, not causing any problems, and police just rolled in and started beating them.
Get out of here with this nonsense.