That's not a good argument. That an extreme is bad doesn't make the opposite extreme good. I could easily have a house that is too large, but I wouldn't want to live in a box.

I mean, I (and most people on this thread...) agree with you, I believe it is almost always "nicer" to be consistent and have minimal ISRs. But her/his point (as I interpret it, at least) was that in some situations a somewhat larger ISR may make sense.