Unfortunately, what you are saying lead to anarchy. You just said that we live in democracy. In democracy disputes are settled in court.
That is a big, and unjustified, leap. Can you explain this assertion?
> You just said that we live in democracy.
I didn't say that, though it is a statement I'd agree with.
> In democracy disputes are settled in court.
This is not actually required to be a democracy. I'm not sure where you get this idea from.
Many things are already settled, either in law, the constitution, treaties, or, yes, court decisions, but do not require further court decisions. One of those is this: Military members are not obligated to follow illegal orders, and can actually be held accountable for failure to disobey.
Regarding the burning down of the police station, that is a different kind of violence and a violent response from the police would've been more warranted.