I was replying to the suggestion that Qt could be released under GPL if its authors wanted to prevent the creative accounting described by OP.
Also, LGPL is already problematic, because you cannot link statically with it.
Also, LGPL is already problematic, because you cannot link statically with it.
"If you statically link against an LGPLed library, you must also provide your application in an object (not necessarily source) format, so that a user has the opportunity to modify the library and relink the application."
Damn. I just wrote the whole top level comment to explain that you can link statically LGPL code and how to do it with details.