Edit: Yeesh, what's with the downvotes? I'm just providing a summary for other people who check the comments first, to catch the gist of an article quickly.
http://www.news.cornell.edu/releases/july97/guitar.ltb.html
Though it is - god help me - nearly fifteen years old so presumably it is no longer that ridiculous. [1] These things probably ship inside every iPhone by now, or something.
Of course, none of this banter should lead you to conclude that the OP's chip art is any less than awesome. Remember, it's not the microscopicness of the equipment that matters, but how you use it. The colors are a very nice touch, for example.
---
[1] And I'm not even going to talk about those AFM folks, or the self-assembled nanomaterials folks. They are just too ridiculous.
Besides, the point of summary comments on short articles is to pre-filter, not post-filter. Without something like that, I have no way of knowing if it'll be a tweet or a novel, and at the time I didn't have time for much longer than a tweet.