Are studies like this done to justify an actual Vitamin D study? They need to take a sample of confirmed COVID patients and test their Vitamin D levels individually.
Are studies like this done to justify an actual Vitamin D study? They need to take a sample of confirmed COVID patients and test their Vitamin D levels individually.
Maybe the poison doesn’t work for carriers of certain genes. Maybe it’s temperature reactive. Maybe it’ll take weeks to kill.
Just because the King observes something do not make his causal conclusions from that observation valid. Adequate sample-sized statistics aim to bridge that gap.
There ain't no such thing as statistical certainty my friend.
Just thinking.
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.04.24.20075838v...
Started reading it and it has an incredibly small sample size. I agree, all these studies are weak. People are rushing to publish any crap they can right now.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32397511 "5-Hydroxyvitamin D Concentrations Are Lower in Patients with Positive PCR for SARS-CoV-2"