You have to view each terminal on its own terms: when viewed from above, each rotating atom at the end of each terminal is rotating oppositely (-/+ charge)...this means when you bring them together they coincide.
But if someone is at a very introductory level and doesn't know anything about rotational symmetry, the point that the terminal ends are rotating opposite directions may be confusing.
The transparency of the render models might lead to someone hearing that point about opposing rotations, stare at those rotating terminal ends, and then have something like the rotating mask illusion (https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=sKa0eaKsdA0) cause them to see that the terminal ends are visually rotating in opposite directions, rather than it being just in relative terms. I was able to do this on purpose with the faster-rotating negative terminal, and its rotation is genuinely kind of ambiguous at the scale I watched the video.
These aren't criticisms of the method, just a couple of points about the video that might pose some conflict with someone who is at a very introductory level.
I do like the idea generally. It's always fun to see new analogies for stuff.
Obviously not a dictate, but if I were trying to explain it to my chemistry freshmen that is how I would do initially.
It might be useful to seek out some non-expert boards that help undergrads in physical science or engineering to see what they think!
Good luck! I'll bookmark your stuff and ref it to some EE people.