It’ll be interesting to see if they can turn this around.
It’ll be interesting to see if they can turn this around.
Hmm, unicorns are usually defined by $1B valuation, while the number of $2.9B in loss is related to revenue. So I think the comparison doesn't hold, it's apples to oranges.
(Comparisons involving both stock and flow measures are somewhat dodgy, but they’re made all the time (debt/GDP, annual rent/house price, unicorns/revenue)).
Edit to add: they’re not really dodgy per se, but the result is a rate, ie has a time dimension.
Is it possible that they pivot the whole business to Uber Eats only?
Truth is - now that they are public ~ I'm not sure what success is... for a lot of people who started there a long time ago - the IPO was 'the success' now the public is left holding the bag (mostly by their own choice of buying the stock).
I think Uber can exist, I just don't see how what they do is worth billions. When Uber withdrew from Austin, it took a couple of days for very similar replacements to pop up.