Reminds me of a similar issue from 2012:
Reminds me of a similar issue from 2012:
I guess I'd rather they just... not... I don't really even think the trade-off in increased seemingly real health risk is worth making the cell network even faster.
It's going to happen though, if there's no mitigation that makes GPS more invulnerable to interference it will inevitably fail when actually needed.
Also, signal disruption is already very common as a necessary precaution at sensitive times and places. I think many military bases and other sensitive places, like the Kremlin, have signal interference so they are very imprecise to target with GPS-guided weapons.
Geostationary orbits are very far away, what leads to horrible timing properties, and all in a single plane. They are almost useless for positioning.
1 - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_Positioning_System#Spac...
GPS satellites are in MEO, at ~20 km MSL. Other GNSS satellites use similar orbits.
https://ligado.com/press/ligado-networks-launches-with-goal-...