I think this is the most recent article they had about this subject
https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/31798/the-secretive-in...
It's a fascinating story, I hope someone gets to the bottom of this.
https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/31798/the-secretive-in...
It's a fascinating story, I hope someone gets to the bottom of this.
1. The whole thing is a dis-info campaign to hook a near adversary into thinking we have spooky next gen technology. This all being public makes me lean this way. Similarly perhaps this is being used as a cover story for some impressive but not physics defying drones, similarly to how "UFOs" were used as an diversion away from projects like Mogul or the f-117 and B-2.
2. Pais is a conman, scamming the military into funding his fraudulent tech.
3. Pais is a breakthrough genius. The Tech is real and in years it will be revealed to the public.
4. The "Bob Lazar" option. "UFOs" as in foreign objects exist and occasionally crash, and are studied and reverse engineered when they do.
It's interesting to note that Pais was recently transferred to submarine command.
Also re: #4 - for what it's worth (and a great entertaining read), Harry Turtledove covers that one too in his "In the Balance" book, where alien invaders show up during WWII. Highly recommend it.
That benthic treaty ain't gonna write itself, mr. howard.
Or it's already installed on Nimitz-class carriers (with huge tires tucked into hidden underwater pods). The navy is just waiting for a serious war to warrant revealing land-carriers capable of driving hundreds of miles inland.
But within 2 hrs in he had to correct himself by saying there's no way you could communitcate via radio because of the supposed conditions keeping it aloft silently.
Another youtube video saying his car was powered by hydrogen, but not stored under pressure because apparently his diy particle accelerator can allow him to produce lithium-6 (not sure about isotope here, but not available public sale) which is the sponge like material in the tanks, metal hydride.
https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/28729/docs-show-navy-g...
Part of the ongoing Psy-Op, "beliver", or what?
Made me think of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_mercury :-)
Who knows?
The comments of "erewhon" (I think the same guy goes by "Tom Bedlam" on other sites) and "jvoight0205" are particularly interesting. https://m.fark.com/comments/1386759/11863499 https://m.fark.com/comments/1203844/9730116 https://m.fark.com/comments/4371964/50871026
Thx
Also I recall a comment chain on Fark between two seemingly knowledgeable commentors that claim to be involved researchers and discuss some of the things in your linked comment, I'll see if I can find them.
An adversary does not need to actually believe everything you say, in order to decide that it's worth looking into what you're trying to hide. This distracts some amount of resources from other investigations, and potentially exposes some of their assets if you've built artificial channels for them to follow.
On the other hand, it's also potentially a great way to find the credible/gullible folks within your adversary, to which you could feed other misinformation later on.