Hacker News Reader

Yeah, back when the original Mac dev kit was released you had to join the developer program for $1500/year. What you got was decent hardware discounts (for hardware that was much high priced than it is today), several loose leaf binders of documentation, and a big stack of floppies. IIRC, the original Mac compilers were designed to run on a Lisa (so toss another $10K in the pot).

As time went on, things got better. Codewarrior by Think appeared, documentation was distributed on CDROM, and the annual dev program dropped to $400.

The $99/yr, or the $4.99, is a pittance. Seriously.

That's a very Windows-centric comment. The cases I am referring to are in regard to non-dominant platforms. Compare OS X, NetWare, Linux to the likes of OS/2, MacOS (8/9), Solaris.

During their dominant periods, dev tools on Solaris and OS9 cost money.

Yes, that is precisely my point.

Then allow me to adjust his statement slightly:

Namely, those with free dev tools have little problem attracting good developers.

What does that even mean? I'm asking seriously. You're saying Windows didn't have a lot of good developers?