> Because there is a large body of evidence throughout history that suggests exactly this.
Yeah, one govt tried that, people didn't like it and people won. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Emergency_(India)
> Because there is a large body of evidence throughout history that suggests exactly this.
Yeah, one govt tried that, people didn't like it and people won. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Emergency_(India)
Or give the data to no one and do contact tracing in a privacy preserving way like the one apple and google designed? https://covid19-static.cdn-apple.com/applications/covid19/cu...
> • Each user will have to make an explicit choice to turn on the technology. It can also be turned off by the user at any time.
Ok, I can give you this one, for people who are mandated by law to have this installed, uninstalling is not an option.
> • This system does not collect location data from your device, and does not share the identities of other users to each other, Google or Apple. The user controls all data they want to share, and the decision to share it.
Yeah, but they have to share it to get any meaningful data, right?
> • Bluetooth privacy-preserving beacons rotate every 10-20 minutes, to help prevent tracking.
Don't know whether the app has this one.
> • Exposure notification is only done on device and under the user's control. In addition people who test positive are not identified by the system to other users, or to Apple or Google.
I would be damned if the govt app was exposing identities either.
> • The system is only used for contact tracing by public health authorities apps.
Sure, that's the whole purpose of the govt app too.
> • Google and Apple can disable the exposure notification system on a regional basis when it is no longer needed.
Not related to privacy I think.
Also, have a read: https://covid19-static.cdn-apple.com/applications/covid19/cu...
All data is stored on phone only, till the point someone is marked as Covid+. Then only the beacon tokens are uploaded to a central whitelist, wherein every phone can download and verify if they came in contact. In case of the contact data only for that day is shared.
Primary difference govt. can know only limited data of people who are +ve or came in contact not a perpetual continuous tracking of every mobile.
If you want an honest answer, I would rather give it to Apple/Google.
At least they will not send their officially hired goons to my house to beat me up due to some perceived slight that I might have committed.
>Yeah, one govt tried that, people didn't like it and people won.
After 21 months. Almost two years. From your own link:
>For much of the Emergency, most of Gandhi's political opponents were imprisoned and the press was censored. Several other human rights violations were reported from the time, including a forced mass-sterilization campaign spearheaded by Sanjay Gandhi, the Prime Minister's son.
Seems like you haven’t read about the contact tracing technology and the policies of Apple and Google in what they’re developing. There is no data taken off the device by those companies through the APIs they provide. Apps developed by the government healthcare administration can take the data and push it anywhere though.