We talk so much about wanting to protect children that we should not be using software that gives audio and video access to their computers that we do not have confidence in.
We talk so much about wanting to protect children that we should not be using software that gives audio and video access to their computers that we do not have confidence in.
>> We talk so much about wanting to protect children that we should not be using software that gives audio and video access to their computers that we do not have confidence in.
Let's start banning facebook. Shall we?
I get your point however I feel there is a different between not having full understanding of the platform you are using (be it Electron, Windows, macOS, Linux, etc) and a small library from Facebook of all companies. The fact they were able to change/fix the issue within a day(?) says to me they just didn't bother to look at what it was really doing in the first place.
> Let's start banning facebook. Shall we?
Is Facebook not banned, or at least extremely restricted within the New York school network? My daughters school in the UK has a complete block on Facebook.
But yes I would happily ban Facebook. I feel the value it adds is not worth the trade off. For the purely social connection functionality (which I do see value in obviously) there are other options that are not as dirty as Facebook.
The only question is different interpretations of “fake”: it is a real system dialogue, invoked by a deprecated API; it is fake in that the text is set by Zoom to trick the user into allowing it to install itself without approval.