You must be pretty new at this. This comment is a rather pedestrian ad hominem - well below the quality you showed earlier with "dimwitted hot take".

Perhaps your statement is true because most people just ignore you?

As I wrote: "I'm probably doing the wrong thing by pointing out some of the problems in your argument head-on, which is something you refused to do with the Nature Medicine communications."

You are again refusing to address substantive counter-arguments to your viewpoints. Why is your goal in making these comments?