So while masks may have some effect, it hasn't been enough to give different graphs to Asian nations in general.
[1] https://www.arcgis.com/apps/opsdashboard/index.html#/bda7594...
So while masks may have some effect, it hasn't been enough to give different graphs to Asian nations in general.
[1] https://www.arcgis.com/apps/opsdashboard/index.html#/bda7594...
Thailand looks straightforwardly exponential so far and has fairly heavy mask use, agreed. But Singapore, Taiwan, and arguably Malaysia seem too early to call: they're still plausibly on either of a European curve or South Korea's ramp-then-flatline.
Vietnam, Cambodia, Laos, Mongolia, and Burma all seem to be below the line for meaningful data. And Hong Kong isn't broken out. So I guess my questions are: do Indonesia and the Philipines have "mask cultures" to a level comparable to South Korea and Japan, and are their testing regimes wide enough to rely on those curves?
I don't know the answer to that. And I agree that the "masks work" graph/meme circulating is questionable. But unless I'm missing something/somewhere, this data just looks like "too soon to call"?
They do a good job collecting all the data but a seriously bad job visualising them.