I'm quoting Larry Wall because he said something interesting.
The comprehensions from twisted were not written for clarity so they aren't good examples. The programmer wanted a one-liner to define these constants.
The comprehensions from twisted were not written for clarity so they aren't good examples. The programmer wanted a one-liner to define these constants.
Even if they say something interesting, is it valuable information coming from that source? Should it be trusted?
no... they're real examples.