- here for future reference
- here for future reference
The idea that you should just sit back and be ok with a 20% haircut isn’t something that I will just “take” if I can help it.
The reasons I could imagine is if the stock is illiquid (401k, lockup, etc)
Long term yours is a losing strategy.
I don’t subscribe to generic investment advice. Options are insurance when things are wacky. The coronavirus has concerned me since January and I hedged accordingly.
Anytime in the last quarter with constant news about all time highs, record low interest rates, overbought stocks with extreme ratios, and a global pandemic affecting supply chains was enough to try and allocate some attention towards a downturn with cheap bets or portfolio protection. 1-5% on puts is well within standard risk management.
You don't need to be a daytrader or prophet for any of this. If you missed the drop and positions have lost value then sell covered calls for income. Then wait it out because we have an entire summer of disrupted global trade coming. Don't think about buying in until that's over.
I love how people are self righteous about the timing but I have been wildly profitable over the last 20 years picking my spots like this.
I’m extremely pessimistic about the market right now, but I’m more pessimistic that if I traded that I wouldn’t lose more money.
I’ve had a big chunk of my 401k sitting on the sidelines for months now. I’m going to wait to see how this virus thing shakes out then use it to buy back in after it looks like the worst is over.
Until then, there’s way too much uncertainty to try and trade this. I’m not retiring for twenty years. Whatever happens it should bounce back in 2-3 years or so.
The point of using options is that I’m still holding a lot of my stock, so if it bounces back up then it’s just my options that lose value.
Literally over 5% of days are all time highs. A full third of days are within 5% of the as-of-yet all time high.
You don't have to be an active trader to preserve your capital. I've been invested for years but around the 2nd week of Feb, I went 100% cash. This time I saw train and got off the tracks. My plan is to average in slowly over time as the market stabilizes and the news gets better.
Hedges cost money. Market goes up long term. You will lose money long-term by hedging. That's the steady state of your strategy. That's the obvious reason why people don't hedge. I'm puzzled as to why you didn't acknowledge this. Instead, you offer an outlier where hedging performed better. Seems deeply disingenuous.
All-time highs, inflated money supply, dropping interest rates, trade wars, overbought stocks, overloaded repo markets, bond yield inflection, and more signs over the last few months are a pretty clear signal to engage in hedging.
It's sometimes worth thinking about timing when there is a move you already want to make for better reasons.
One can see this in Berkshire's cash hoard. Expect to see it deployed in the year to come, when valuations may become more in-line with historical norms.
All-time highs after 10 year bull run + coronavirus pandemic is a good time to at least buy some puts or move into cash holdings.
Should you have bought or sold Friday? Should you buy or sell this coming Monday? Answering these questions accurately is in fact hard.
Timing days is impossible. Timing a trend over months is what I'm talking about, and anytime in the last 2 months was a good time to allocate 1-5% on making money or protecting your investments from a market drop.
At this point, if your investments have lost value then sell some covered calls to make income while you stay out of the market. We have an entire summer of disrupted global trade coming, don't buy in until that's over.
If it was that easy everyone would do it, or at least the "simple basic timing"-fund with twice the gain would be more popular than any etf.
But probably more realistic you are just deluding yourself.
2) Hedge funds aren't open to the public and don't care about popularity. Their mandate is to limit volatility, not to maximize gains. That's why they might not match indexes in bull markets but outearn them in turbulent times.
3) There is an inflection point with capital where it gets much harder to make more because of changes in liquidity, transparency, and price action resulting from your moves. Independent traders can make 100% gains from large moves, a large fund could never do that unless it was an absolute perfect scenario.
4) I'm surprised that so many people find it hard to believe that months of constant negative news after 10 years of perfect bull run and frothy all-time highs does not signal a hint of a downturn. What more of a sign do you need? Nuclear war?
5) Ray Dalio did it in November 2019, and even made it clear that it was standard hedging: https://markets.businessinsider.com/news/stocks/ray-dalio-br...
Practice has proven that fund managers can't beat the market, let alone double the gains.
But if you can, you must be a millionaire. You would be the best fund manager in the world. Congratulations on your achievement!
Edit: That would be an average of 14% gain a year... wow, such skill, amaze!
Neither has anything to do with seeing the numerous warning signs over the last 3 months pointing to increased risk of a downturn which was worth a small percentage on puts.
If you want to be a completely passive buy-and-hold investor then that's fine, but you don't have to be a daytrader to make some basic adjustments for the next quarter based on global news.
Sure, it might one day. Are you the lucky one now? We'll see in a few months.
And if your total assets increased with 150%, you are probably gambling with your money, unless you had a black swan with 20x return.
It seems like the disagreement is from completely passive investors who don't realize that there are levels between daytrader and adjusting positions every few weeks based on news.
Also I have friends in real estate who have earned 100% returns in a single year. It's not an impossible feat.
Why do you think this is not already reflected in the current price? You are the only person on the stock market following the news?
> adjusting positions every few weeks based on news
You really don't get it do you? You don't buy or sell based on things going good or bad. You buy when things are under-priced, and sell when things are overpriced. And even with the latter you don't know the exact timing when the market will realize this.
> Also I have friends in real estate who have earned 100% returns in a single year. It's not an impossible feat.
If you can win 100% in a year, you can just as easily lose 50%. That's just how returns, risk and time work.
My point is that basic adjustments following the news can easily increase gains instead of passive buy-and-hold investing. The market will trend down for the next 3 months, use that however you will.
Let's see in 3 months :)
That said, eventually we will have a vaccine, anti-viral, or effective test&quarantine system; and the time to buy is BEFORE we have this under control.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Severe_acute_respiratory_syn...