The Low Prices vs. Bargains Dilemma
creativesamba.substack.com
creativesamba.substack.com
JC Penney had an established group of customers who liked what it offered - and for many, this presumably included liking (even enjoying?) the coupons and sales approach that was offered. In changing the model, JC Penney totally disenfranchised the whole group of customers who liked that approach. (It doesn't matter why they liked it, or whether other people also like it... it just mattered to JC Penney at the time that lots of customers did get some sort of gratification from it.)
Does this mean that no business can therefore ever succeed without a coupons and sales model? Of course not - and there's plenty of successful businesses with a different model. They're just started with a different model, and therefore appeal to a different customer base from the start.
The message of this example isn't that "people don't want low prices, they want bargains". It should be that "you change major aspects of your business model that your established customers like, at your peril".
The "always low prices" model is a bit more complicated to make work than it sounds, but works for e.g. the "discount supermarkets" of Aldi and Lidl.
I think the repetitiveness of a purchase matters: if you're buying a one-off, you want the biggest discount and you don't care what the price is at all other times. If you buy the same thing every week, you may be more interested in reducing the decision workload by going somewhere consistently cheap.
Some countries have laws against this, that something can only be advertised as e.g. a sale if the product has had significant sales at the non-discounted price.
What’s the difference? I don’t follow Steam, but it used to be common knowledge that every month or so it would offer deep discounts and you should wait until then to buy and people joked about emptying their wallets due to it.
How about business to business sales where there is no listed price, even though the product is the same? Microsoft can sell Windows and Office at different prices to whoever it wants.
As long as the price is publicly available and transparent, I don’t care what it was an hour before I buy it or an hour after I buy it.
I also think it’s funny how people seem to relish clothing discounts as it seems to be causing the same dopamine hits that a scratch off lottery ticket does. Label the dress $200 crossed out, then put a red 50% off sticker on it $100, then put a nebulous sign on the rack saying 30% off clearance taken at register, and you have no idea what the thing costs until it gets scanned. And then the buyer acts pleasantly surprised at whatever price pops up.
I’d like to see a service that tracks price history for all goods and you can just look up how much something sold for and easily figure out it’s below average or above average. Like google flight price history.
> As long as the price is publicly available and transparent, I don’t care what it was an hour before I buy it or an hour after I buy it.
Most people don't agree with that, and in some places it's the law e.g. https://www.asa.org.uk/advice-online/promotional-savings-cla...
> I’d like to see a service that tracks price history for all goods and you can just look up how much something sold for and easily figure out it’s below average or above average. Like google flight price history.
"Camelcamelcamel" claims to do this for Amazon.
For many people I know, we all have a backlog of games we haven't even gotten to yet. And there is a convenience with digital goods that doesn't work so well with brick & mortar stores.
I put stuff on my wishlist throughout the year, and if the price is good enough, I spend a few moments clicking, and I have it. Easy.
If I'm in the store looking for a shirt, it is probably because I need one soon. So dealing with coupons is a hassle, with the alternative that I feel I'm getting ripped of paying full price. I'd go to Costco, but the selection for clothing items is generally quite poor.
After the CEO was fired and the prices went back to the seesawing coupon schedule, I quit going and moved on to something else. He had a good idea. I will miss the no-nonsense pricing.
When it comes to computer parts, I love to shop. I will read and analyze for months, while keeping a close eye on prices.
For example, I'd been in the market for a new GPU for a while. And prices over the last couple of years due to crypto-mining have mostly sucked, with retail prices above MSRP for many cards in much of that timeframe.
However, in January, I was able to pick up an open-box RX 580 with 8GB RAM for $126, which is still a good deal a couple months later. I've been very pleased with that purchase, and hopefully the rest of my system can handle Baldur's Gate 3 at a decent quality (when the game comes out later this year).
I'm not sure what my point is... People are complicated?
They don't offer examples where their claim holds true, nor go into the (potentially interesting) detail of why this might be true psychologically, or link to any studies like these sorts of posts usually do. Even if those studies make vague claims, at least offer further reading.
And I would love a shop that always gave low prices instead of temporary discounts. At least, that's what I keep telling myself; I don't actually mind paying more for quality products. There are a couple of very successful Dutch chains specialising in low prices (Action, Lidl), and I never actually go there. Instead, I go to more expensive shops that have exactly what I want but require a bonus card to claim the discount, which I do while hating it.
We're utterly irrational creatures, and I'm no different, apparently.
On the other hand, when I bought my first dishwasher, I found a model that was discounted from €300 to €200. I shopped around a bit more and found the exact same model at another shop for €200 and no discount. I bought it at the second shop. So there I clearly did prefer cheap over discounted.
Price segmentation helps businesses extract maximum revenue.
I'd do the same, but not because "cheap over discounted", but because the second shop is honest, while the first one is trying to trick people.
The UK service Ocado provides this functionality, but due to its constantly rotating offers shopping in this manner is inefficient.
I would much rather lower prices than offers.
When I go to JCPenny, Macy's, or other stores at our dying mall (I think that might be all that's left), I head straight for the clearance rack. I'll buy those clothes for $10 or $15, or less.
It's a low price, and I feel like I'm getting a "$55 shirt" for $10.
Between that and vanity sizing buying clothes involves a lot of looking at and interpreting bullshit numbers.
In the always-low-prices model, no cross-subsidy is available, so you lose a lot of the people who care about low prices, and you don't gain many of the people who don't care because, well, they don't care.
But I admit it would cut the usual "deal" hormonal hook.
Honesty loses to dishonesty on the market.
> Low prices make us feel like we're tightwad bastards (Scrooge McDuck style). But bargains make us feel special and smart. And they allow our brains to change the narrative, "I didn't spend $60, I saved $45".
> People don't want low prices, they want bargains.
I want to reach parity. Most of the times these items were sitting in corners, sometimes even some were things I found. But I wanted to make the dance with the other person to find the middle ground where both of us would feel happy. Sometimes even if I gave him more than I should, to me it felt alright. The value is no more in the item, it's in making two people feel happy.
They lost ~$1Billion in a year. The customer voted.