You completely missed the point or maybe you just don't give a s++t about 1A rights.
The other issue is they claimed to be hands off to customers, obviously within the bounds of the law.
The sad truth is this - distasteful as DS/Anglin is, he was not running afoul of the law. Matthew Prince unilaterally decided to reverse 200+ years of 1A jurisprudence for one of its customers because he disagreed with their views.
These Matthew Prince types are the same assclowns who sue Christian bakeries for refusing to adorn wedding cakes with 2 male or 2 female figures when they exercise their 1A rights to discriminate based in faith preferences.
The height of hypocrisy displayed by Cloudflare was galaxy sized, despite it being legal.
That's what I and many others blasted them about.
I can't put it any more clearly than this.