> It also saves more lives than it kills people. So?

Do you have data that the rest of us don't - that is data which identifies incursions (that is near-crash interactions which do not end in a crash) where vehicular automation acts correctly and human drivers do not?

If not, than you really can't make that statement.

You can say that "Tesla's luxury cars running under autopilot show fewer crashes per mile than average for all cars", and be accurate, but that's not "saving lives".

Depending on the numbers, the “saves more than it kills” standard may be 99.9% or 99.9999%. You need data to answer the question and any claims should be backed up by numbers, followed by a bunch of analysis. It’s definitely not something we can prove about currently sold technology with a one-line quip.

it's not quite there yet, unless you believe at the stats published by Tesla that compares apples and oranges.