> ... and possibly saving sensitive personal in- formation [32, 55, 38, 26].
They left 4 related articles in the publication please read the actual paper before criticizing it.
> and widely disproven
I personally never heard of it. Any evidence?
They left 4 related articles in the publication please read the actual paper before criticizing it.
> and widely disproven
I personally never heard of it. Any evidence?
While I do appreciate that the cited sources in their paper, I would have appreciated actual information security papers rather than mainstream media articles.