Many years ago, I took a poetry class and on the first day the instructor said (roughly): When E.E. Cummings did not capitalize the word 'I', it was creative and original. You are not E. E. Cummings. If you do not capitalize 'I', you are boring and pretentious. Capitalize your 'I's."
Breaking the rules of grammar is good when it adds value to the writing. I don't see how refusing to capitalize added any value here.
Would you apply the same reasoning to Cummings?
The post I replied to basically said that asking for capitalization makes you stickler to pointless rules who won't get far in life. I merely replied in kind to the tone of that post which probably isn't exactly nice of me but I would say it is fair.
Cummings disregarded capitalization norms in his prose as well.
Edit: Maybe you meant: since Cummings wrote a lot of poetry, he is a special case and therefore can be forgiven for disregarding capitalization norms in his prose?
I can write a program to generate thousands of haikus. Doing so does not make that body of poetry meaningful in any way [0].
[0] Well, other than the fact that it got me a free monogrammed PowerBook G4 Laptop sleeve that was being given away by some people who underestimated the willingness of a younger programmer to beseige them with computer-generated haikus. ;)
Edit: Or maybe you are saying that we should only presume motive of people who don't write great works?
>> i also know which rules don't matter
Are you sure? These 2 statements conflict in this context.
(aka the problem is you)