> Doing all those things is possible
Renewables make up almost 0% of the total energy used by the world. Getting rid of fossil fuels or the fossil fuel industry is simply not possible. This is basic economics and physics. It's science.
> in fact it's happening even without subsidies in many places
Name one place where subsidies didn't prop up renewables.
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2019/jun/05/home-sol...
https://ieefa.org/subsidy-cuts-result-in-sharp-drop-in-u-k-r...
The green energy industry itself admits it needs subsidies to exist hence why they lobby for more subsidies.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/jeffreydorfman/2015/09/01/solar...
> Europe is already on IPCC 2C targets, and it's clearly not starving, its economy is fine.
That's because Europe's fossil fuel use hasn't dropped. It has actually increased. Not only that, europe is building or trying to build pipelines from russia and the middle east to meet their energy needs. What do you the instability in syria was about? What do you think the geopolitical skirmish with russia is about? Pipelines and fossil fuels. Europe wants more of it, not less.
> It really feels like a failure of science, technology and engineering community. We're failing at communicating.
No. The communication is fine if you actually read and understand the science, technology and engineering. If you get your information from fearmongering newspapers, cable news or social media, then you have a real problem.
While you worry about the end of the world, the science/tech/engineering community is planning future research into the 30s, 40s, etc. Space flight into the 30s, 40s. Mega construction projects in the 30s, 40s, etc - some of which will last decades. Surely if the world was going to end, these highly intelligent people wouldn't be wasting time and resources on such projects.
I don't want to add to your anxiety, but the indian subcontinent, ASEAN, middle east, south america and africa are going to industrialize heavily in the coming decades. Conservatively, they make up about 40% of the world's population. So fossil fuel use is going to go up in the coming decades.
So economics, science and reality says that fossil fuel use is going to increase. So if you are really sincere in what you say, then ask yourself, what is all the climate change rhetoric really about?