Yes and no. It's a cost-benefit deal. Just because they _can_ (and they surely can), doesn't mean it is cost beneficial to do so now. It takes CPU time (and therefore money) for each encode they do. If one takes much more resources to do, it may not be beneficial to do so yet. I originally posted my comment wondering if there had been some encoder breakthrough that I had missed that had made AV1 a viable option finally. Looks like there was, but it's still not nearly as good as it needs to be fore widespread adoption (looks like it's still 30x slower than a comparable HEVC or VP9 encode). So I guess it comes down to: are they saving enough on downstream bandwidth to balance out the CPU time for the encode? Releasing it would suggest yes, or they see some benefit to pushing the standard into the mainstream now rather than in six months regardless of the cost to them.