Hacker News Reader

>pseudo-science

I'm not sure why you mention this as a contrast. Macro evolution also does not follow the scientific method as there is no repeatable experiment you can design to falsify the hypothesis. This is well-known among evolutionary biologists.

View on HN

Stop spreading pseudoscience. There's no macro-evolution, there's just evolution. Pick up a biology book instead of your Bible

I hadn't heard of macro-evolution so take this from the stance of a skeptical relatively well-reasoning individual. I can't see anything from a cursory browse that suggests it's a pseudoscience? Am I missing something?

- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Macroevolution

- https://evolution.berkeley.edu/evolibrary/article/evo_48

- https://www.nature.com/scitable/knowledge/library/macroevolu...

- https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/macroevolution/

Try typing "macro evolution" into Google scholar. You'll see plenty of mainstream evolutionary biologist using the term.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com