Hacker News Reader

I don't know where you get the idea from that corruption in Nigeria affects the safety of their very own artifacts. How is allowing the looters to keep the loot safer?

It is like saying that robbers can keep whatever they stole for as long as they can keep it safe.

Nigeria can choose to do whatever they want with their artifacts.

View on HN

It's unclear who the rightful owners are. The most specific one would be the current oba, but Nigeria doesn't want them to go back to the oba. So it's kind of complicated. Nigeria seems fine with the loans, maybe because they know that gets them more of the bronzes than if they all went back to the oba. I think the best thing would be to have them back to the oba.

What is unclear/complicated here? This is between 2 countries, Britain and Nigeria. Not between Britain and a person. The oba is Nigerian. These artifacts are part of an entire country's heritage.

But they were private property at the time they were stolen by the British. A government doesn't generally have the right to take objects from citizens simply because they are culturally important.

In modern terms, that would be like somebody from Britain stealing Warhol's "Eight Elvises". Then, the US government demands they be given to the Smithsonian instead of back to the rightful owner.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com