It sounds like they have a chicken and egg problem if they're still called "The WHO subcommittee that names things"
https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/coronaviruse/situati...
In English I think it's more commonly referred to as "swine flu" though.
That’s a very different context than a virus originating from a particular area.
Also, in India the colonial reference was the official excuse. In my view, it was purely a show of political power.
Failing that, local culture would refer to those cities by those reticent names somewhere. Local newspapers, pamphlets, propaganda material. No evidence of that.
0: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Renaming_of_cities_in_India
Even today, experts aren’t certain where the outbreak originated. Some say China, some say the American Midwest, and others suggest France. But one thing’s for certain—it wasn’t Spain.
“Nobody calls it [the Spanish flu],” says Albert Bosch, president of the Spanish Society for Virology. “It just happened to be the place where it was reported, and that’s it.” Arnold says the Spaniards themselves had different names for the virus—sometimes “the French flu” for their historic rival, sometimes “Naples Soldier” after a popular musical—but it was the name in the Times that would stick.
[1] https://www.sciencefriday.com/articles/the-origin-of-the-spa...
https://www.history.com/news/why-was-it-called-the-spanish-f...
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Middle_East_respiratory_syndro...