> more robust programs
And by “more robust programs”, you mean more related confiscatory taxation. Meaning that, again, men must surrender even more, and accept even less, to accommodate women.
And by “more robust programs”, you mean more related confiscatory taxation. Meaning that, again, men must surrender even more, and accept even less, to accommodate women.
When did men surrendered something to accommodate women? From what I remember women were the ones who accommodated men for thousand of years.
Why are childrens well-being not the concern of men? You have assumed something to be true, that I haven't, maybe.