Hacker News Reader

your belligerence is completely asinine. the part of this discussion that i participated in branches off of this comment

>As a maintainer, it is his choice which patches to accept.

PRs were made

>And then it happens all over again. More unsafe, more patches rejected,

that is an implicit/explicit demand that alterations be made. is that not crystal clear to you?

View on HN

And people are allowed to criticize his reluctance to accept those vital security patches, because he submitted code packaged as a crate to be used by others on a public registry.

By publishing something to be used by others in a public registry, you are opting in to receive criticism from the public.

Criticism is not the same thing as vitriol and I’m not endorsing the latter even one iota.

Is that not crystal clear to you?

Reply on news.ycombinator.com