If US dollar stores are anything like UK pound stores, they are vastly more expensive for food than the discount supermarkets -- Aldi, Lidl, Iceland and similar. They're OK to great value for many non-food things, like a cheap spare pair of reading glasses, notebook, pencils or USB cable etc. If there's a pound store it's fairly safe bet one of the above three supermarkets will have an outlet not too far away too.
Nearly all the food they sell is a custom, pound store only size, and the price per gram or litre is pathetic for anyone lacking funds. They trade on appearing to offer price advantage, perhaps 10p or 20p in the pound cheaper than the supermarket, by cutting 25 or 35% of the product. If you aren't comparing price/unit you're basically getting scammed by poundstores on all food and drink. Of course they appeal most to the section of society most uncomfortable with maths by seeming cheap, even if the truth is on the small print of the shelf label.
They positively drip with unhealthy only options. Miles of chocolate, cereal, milk shake, soft drinks, tinned beans. No veg, no rice, no pasta, pulses, low sugar soft drinks, milk itself.
Dollar Stores are often predatory for food. Regular grocery stores already operate on thin margins. Dollar stores are preying on those trying to save money by being closer and easier to get to. All while deceiving poor people on the true cost of their food.
All things equal Dollar Stores would be fine, but they pull the oxygen out of the market for proper low margin grocery stores.
I think banning usurious interest rates can be elitist. But a lot of upper middle class politicians don't understand how expensive it can be to not have money. And getting hit with overdraft fees, having your electricity shut off, or not being able to make it to work because your car broke down can all be very expensive and make the usurious interest rates look cheap.
I don't see the connection but restricting medicine but I do think that non addictive medication is overly restricted.
Smoking and gambling(and drinking) are specific vices and restricting them isn't elitist but banning pall malls would be.
I'm not against elitist policies in principle. Of there is a lot of data that a particular intervention has a strong positive effect than I'm for it. But I'm just suspicious of a bunch upper middle class politicians deciding what's best for a lower class one and legislating away their options.
Researchers don't know if even one of those causal links is real, much less all of them.
Anyway, my comment was in response to disdain for experts in favor of parents. That sort of anti-intellectual mindset can hit the road.
That sneering disdain for the self-determination of "anti-intellectuals" has led to much human suffering. Rule of experts does not scale. And academia does not necessarily produce superior expertise. Indeed, the endemic, institutional corruption often produces the opposite. Rationalia would be no paradise.
It is elitist to force others to do so.
Second of all, this seems like a question of semantics. I don't know what exactly you mean by elitism, but if you see this as elitist then I find it acceptably elitist for me.
https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=true&que...
You call it a personal attack--I call it a logical observation: one who advocates authoritarianism is a tyrant. Of course, authoritarian tyrants don't like to be called so. "Hurtful" and "problematic" opinions must be shamed.
HN ought to be concerned with the proliferation of authoritarianism rather than calling it out. Oppression flourishes where honest criticism is not allowed. "Democracy dies in darkness," right?
Well I do, and everything you said is false in the USA.
They carry high-end family-sized canned soup for $1, which I often buy.
They carry pasta ingredients for $1, which I buy if I'm in the mood to cook it.
I haven't seen vegetables.
AMA.
Would you live a slightly less comfortable life to see other people eat healthy? Food is expensive, but I'm sure there's fat in your budget.
I agree banning dollar food stores is elitist, but it's also incredibly myopic by those in power to not also address the root cause which is you have a segment of the population that can't afford good food and has to consume food that exposes them to a greater set of negative health consequences.
Raising minimum wages, and progressive taxation would go along way to fix a lot of this. \_(:|)_/
These people don’t exist. Nutritionally complete diets that are very cheap include parties and milk, beans and rice, peanut butter and bread. If you add vitamin supplements or practically any meat that isn’t totally lean or any fruits or vegetables you will be perfectly healthy.
Food is cheap enough that in Mexico the problem is obesity, not malnutrition. The US is a lot richer than Mexico.
AOC’s previous employer The Coffee Shop which was a major diner in NYC had to shut down last year because they couldn’t afford a $2 raise in the minimum wage.